Iranian Journal of Sociology

Abstract Conducting experimental social studies by qualitative method and developmental space and developing these methods has discussed the evaluation of this research and the validity and accuracy of the findings of this research. In particular, this issue is very visible in our country, and the search for sources and articles related to the criteria of qualitative research evaluation and their fingerprinting is a testament to the problematic nature of this issue. This is the concern of the authors in this article. In this research work, three parts of research components, research criteria and research strategies have been separated. By examining components such as researcher characteristics, conceptual framework, background factors, research goals and questions, data collection procedures, data management and analysis, the importance of careful criteria in each of these components It is emphasized. This article insists on the separation of rigor criteria from rigor strategies and, of course, the relationship between the two. To be rigor, a variety of criteria have been proposed by thinkers, some of which are: credibility, transferability, dependability, conformabilty, coherence, sampling adequacy, substantive validity, and ethical validity. Each of these criteria is related with the strategies such as peer debriefing, reflectivity, thick description, member checking, external audies, complexity of analysis, and referential adequacy.
 
 

Abstract  In the third millennium, is expected from holders of knowledge with having social capital, especially in academic areas, while creating new knowledge as a latent capital, in order to promote community problems, Could play an active role. In this base, The aim of this research is The sociological Study ofSocial capital (arise of Bourdieu, Coleman, Putnam, and Fukuyama) impact on knowledge creation (arise of Nonaka, Takeuchi &…)in Isfahan university. Research method of this study was Survey, statistical population including academic members of IsfahanUniversity (1387) that 142 person of them were selected by Cochran Formula, based on random Sampling. Technique of the study was Questionnaire. Statistical method was including, Multiple Regression and Path Analysis. To assess Path Coefficient, LISREL Method Estimated has been used. All of the data set was analyzed (get from questionnaire) by Spss₁₇ software. Result showed that there are significant relationships between social capital and knowledge creation, namely whatever increases social capital, the same extant, increases knowledge creation. R Adjusted Square showed that 19 percent of variations of dependent variable, explained by Independent variables. Other impacts related to another variables, which we did not considered them.