From Max Weber (1946) H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills. Oxford university Press
Volume 20, Issue 3, Autumn 2019, Pages 142-153
https://doi.org/10.22034/jsi.2019.44354
. .
Abstract چکیده ندارد چکیده ندارد چکیده نداردچکیده ندارد چکیده ندارد
A Critical Look at Weber’s Interpretative Sociology and Applying His Approach in Research on Historical Sociology of Iranian Society
Volume 20, Issue 2, Summer 2019, Pages 4-25
https://doi.org/10.22034/jsi.2020.43310
Farhang Ershad
Abstract The main aim of this paper is formulating a theoretical framework, by getting help from Weber’s approach, to apply it while studying the comparative historical sociology of Iranian society. In the first part of the paper, it is attempted to have a selective review of the theoretical perspective of Max Weber. In this review, in addition to concentrate on the epistemology of modernity and rationality as the main concepts of Weber’s sociology, we considered some important subjects such as the typology of social actions, the interpretative understanding of social facts and the valuable advice of Weberian ideal types. We think that the interpretative understanding of weber’s approach would help us to extend and deepen our understanding of Iranian comparative historical sociology. To obtain satisfactory methodological and theoretical achievements, we studied Weber’s works critically, examined some works on Iran’s social history, and reviewed our long experience of teaching historical sociology. Therefore this paper has attempted to concentrate on the distinguished Weber’s doctrine of ideal types. For us, this doctrine is still a suitable research guideline to prepare an interpretative analysis in historical sociology on the present Iranian society.
Rereading Shamlou’s Poems With the Use of Structuralism Approach
Volume 19, Issue 1, Spring 2018, Pages 68-90
https://doi.org/10.22034/jsi.2018.36648
Rashid Hashemi, Farhang Ershad, Seyfollah Seyfollahi, Firoz Rad
Abstract This interdisciplinary and analytical article attempted to provide an interpretation for Ahmad Shamlou’s poems from a sociological point of view. For this purpose, we used two different fields: sociology and Persian literature. The theoretical framework was a combination of various approaches to structuralism. In addition, we employed Foucault's discourse analysis and Laclau's critical discourse analysis as our research method. The findings revealed that Shamlou’s works have an ideological, semantic and linear determination. As a result, his works are structuralistic and therefore, it is impossible to read them differently. The results also showed that Persian literature has a high capacity to address and interpret human and social issues. Plus, the present paper underlines the importance of interdisciplinary studies.
