Political Economy of Cancer in Iran
Volume 23, Issue 3, Autumn 2022, Pages 107-130
https://doi.org/10.22034/jsi.2023.546410.1521
Yousef Salimiy Ghale, Mohammad Farhadi, Nader Amiri
Abstract The central aim of this article is providing a social analysis of the issue of cancer in Iran. Based on the argument that medicalizing reduces the issue of cancer to a biological matter and hides the social components of the disease. This image is confused with the totality of this disease, whose analysis leads to some social structures, including economic and political relations. The authors of this research paper attempt to show the socio-economic method of health and disease and social characteristics of cancer. The research method is based on political economy perspective. This method is based on analysis of available information to bring into the light some hidden aspects of the reality of cancer. Our findings show that the risk factors for cancer are determined by economic and social factors and the distribution of resources and access to facilities for behavioral patterns of people explain their risk level. Smoking, inactivity and nutrition patterns that cause cancer risk factors correspond to the ranking of the people involved, and the socioeconomic lower groups are at a possible risk. Understanding of cancer as a social reality, directs the treatment of this disease towards political solutions in the use of resources.
The Lived Experience of Tehrani Citizens During Corona Epidemic (Context, Conditions, and Coping Methods)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Winter 2022, Pages 73-97
https://doi.org/10.22034/jsi.2022.554229.1583
fatemeh javaheri, hossein serajzadeh, shirin ahmadnia, ehsan aminian
Abstract To do this, we conducted grounded theory and in-depth semi-structured interviews. Also, we used purposive sampling to recruit 15 male and female adults who lived in Tehran. Then, we read the data and coded significant statements and 12 main categories and the core category of ‘erosion of health and livelihood in the crisis and failure of change management’. The results showed that the corona epidemic has affected the quality of people's livelihood and health system, and has had consequences such as physical and mental damage and employment vulnerability. In addition, casual and contextual conditions such as intra-occupational mechanisms, awareness of prevention methods, disease experience, individual's assessment of the government's performance, and the level of social support have been effective in facing these consequences.
