<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Iranian Sociological of Association</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Iranian Journal of Sociology</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-1901</Issn>
				<Volume>14</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The problematization of historical gap in Iranian Kurdestan
(reflection on pre-modern/modern gap)</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The problematization of historical gap in Iranian Kurdestan
(reflection on pre-modern/modern gap)</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>63</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>96</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">21080</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Rohi</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>05</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>If we forget about some serious works on the history of Iran,
we will notice that most of the theories in this field are highly
influenced by orientalism. These paradigms which are in the tradition of
history of philosophy, inevitably, see Iran&#039;s history in the mirror of state
and therefore, pay no attention to local and non-governmental
phenomena. It generally assumed that the history of Persian kings is the
history of Iran and consequently, our history is analysed based on the
events that occurred in the palaces.
In the article, I attempt to put those approaches away and use new
ones that stress the local and non-governmental events, especially in
Kurdestan of Iran. In other words, I try to deconstruct the formal history
writing and re-read the history of &quot;the moment&quot;. Given that it is a first
step in this field, it is going to be hard work. In this paper, it is assumed
that there is a gap between pre-modern and modern eras in Iran. To
gather the data, I used the documentary method.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">If we forget about some serious works on the history of Iran,
we will notice that most of the theories in this field are highly
influenced by orientalism. These paradigms which are in the tradition of
history of philosophy, inevitably, see Iran&#039;s history in the mirror of state
and therefore, pay no attention to local and non-governmental
phenomena. It generally assumed that the history of Persian kings is the
history of Iran and consequently, our history is analysed based on the
events that occurred in the palaces.
In the article, I attempt to put those approaches away and use new
ones that stress the local and non-governmental events, especially in
Kurdestan of Iran. In other words, I try to deconstruct the formal history
writing and re-read the history of &quot;the moment&quot;. Given that it is a first
step in this field, it is going to be hard work. In this paper, it is assumed
that there is a gap between pre-modern and modern eras in Iran. To
gather the data, I used the documentary method.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">palace Dwelling, Gap, Continuity, Nation-state,</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Imperial Identity, Historical Sociology, Historical Individual, Modernity</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Experience, Problem of Kurd, Ardalan Government, Amir, History</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Philosophy, Development Idea</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">http://www.jsi-isa.ir/article_21080_96b6715edb4b085b70f0cff47d43a1ed.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
