<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Iranian Sociological of Association</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Iranian Journal of Sociology</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-1901</Issn>
				<Volume>15</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Gender and Autobiography
Alternative Possibilities for Narrating Feminine Experiences</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Gender and Autobiography
Alternative Possibilities for Narrating Feminine Experiences</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>65</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>91</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">21085</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M S.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Zokaei</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>K.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Tavanay Manafi</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>05</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Autobiography genre, in its canonical and conventional sense of the
word, is a sum of acceptable and legitimate methods and trends in narrating
the life story. In other words, this genre foregrounds regulated and specific
forms of constituting the life story, and at the same time, excludes alternative
forms of doing so. Therefore autobiography genre eventually imposes a
normative compulsion on how to constitute a life story; and by doing so, it tries
to distinguish the acceptable methods and forms from the unacceptable ones.
These foregrounding and exclusion have important consequences and
significations if we consider the fact that the conventional and canonical forms
of autobiography only make some sorts of subjectivity possible, and hence
limits other sorts of subjectivity at the same time. In other words, canonical
forms of autobiography insist on constituting certain kinds of life experience,
and therefore impose absence on the other kinds. One of the fields in which
this absence may have decisive significations, is the category of gender, and
more specifically, the category of women&#039;s autobiography. That&#039;s due to the
fact that the canonical field of autobiography has historically excluded the
women&#039;s life writing from the canon, and therefore has become a distinctive
genre only because of this exclusion. In other words, one of the most decisive
exclusions in the process of defining autobiography genre is certainly a genderbased
exclusion. Thus, introducing women&#039;s autobiography can be seen as an
act of destabilizing the conventional and canonical genre of autobiography, and
at the same time, it may also lead to some alternative forms and spaces for
constituting the life experience of women. In this article, by focusing on various
students&#039; autobiographies, we&#039;ve tried to depict and describe these student&#039;s
struggles for constituting the feminine life story and experience; a struggle
which is, more than anything else, carried out by resisting, as well as departing
from, the canonical forms of autobiography.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Autobiography genre, in its canonical and conventional sense of the
word, is a sum of acceptable and legitimate methods and trends in narrating
the life story. In other words, this genre foregrounds regulated and specific
forms of constituting the life story, and at the same time, excludes alternative
forms of doing so. Therefore autobiography genre eventually imposes a
normative compulsion on how to constitute a life story; and by doing so, it tries
to distinguish the acceptable methods and forms from the unacceptable ones.
These foregrounding and exclusion have important consequences and
significations if we consider the fact that the conventional and canonical forms
of autobiography only make some sorts of subjectivity possible, and hence
limits other sorts of subjectivity at the same time. In other words, canonical
forms of autobiography insist on constituting certain kinds of life experience,
and therefore impose absence on the other kinds. One of the fields in which
this absence may have decisive significations, is the category of gender, and
more specifically, the category of women&#039;s autobiography. That&#039;s due to the
fact that the canonical field of autobiography has historically excluded the
women&#039;s life writing from the canon, and therefore has become a distinctive
genre only because of this exclusion. In other words, one of the most decisive
exclusions in the process of defining autobiography genre is certainly a genderbased
exclusion. Thus, introducing women&#039;s autobiography can be seen as an
act of destabilizing the conventional and canonical genre of autobiography, and
at the same time, it may also lead to some alternative forms and spaces for
constituting the life experience of women. In this article, by focusing on various
students&#039; autobiographies, we&#039;ve tried to depict and describe these student&#039;s
struggles for constituting the feminine life story and experience; a struggle
which is, more than anything else, carried out by resisting, as well as departing
from, the canonical forms of autobiography.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">autobiography, gender, life story, life experience, narrative,</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">canonical form</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">http://www.jsi-isa.ir/article_21085_6060d12ec4413d29a17e7584783c23be.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
