<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Iranian Sociological of Association</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Iranian Journal of Sociology</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-1901</Issn>
				<Volume>20</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2019</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Criticism of Weber’s Expositors’ Ideas on Ideal Types</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Criticism of Weber’s Expositors’ Ideas on Ideal Types</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>65</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>75</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">43312</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22034/jsi.2020.43312</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Hosein</FirstName>
					<LastName>Abolhasan Tanhaei</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>12</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This short article has attempted to show how the most important term in Weber’s methodology, ideal types had been interpreted incorrectly by the expositors of his ideas. As a result, his ideal type has been limited to only two types: sociological ideal type and historical ideal type. And contrary to what Weber has said Methodology of Social Sciences, these two types are often given a subjective interpretation by the expositors. &lt;br /&gt;  &lt;br /&gt; </Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">This short article has attempted to show how the most important term in Weber’s methodology, ideal types had been interpreted incorrectly by the expositors of his ideas. As a result, his ideal type has been limited to only two types: sociological ideal type and historical ideal type. And contrary to what Weber has said Methodology of Social Sciences, these two types are often given a subjective interpretation by the expositors. &lt;br /&gt;  &lt;br /&gt; </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Ideal Type</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Historical Ideal Type</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Sociological Ideal type</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Dialectical Ideal type</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">http://www.jsi-isa.ir/article_43312_5ea8a1f62e96aa638379b4cdd5090013.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
