<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Iranian Sociological of Association</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Iranian Journal of Sociology</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-1901</Issn>
				<Volume>26</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Methodological Dominance: Rethinking the Place of Paradigm, Theory, and Methodology in Social Science Research</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Methodological Dominance: Rethinking the Place of Paradigm, Theory, and Methodology in Social Science Research</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">740856</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22034/jsi.2026.2095149.1843</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Kaveh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Haji-Allahverdipoor</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0001-7947-0045</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This study is based on the premise that a problem in contemporary social science research is the inversion of its logical architecture and, consequently, a shift in the roles and relationships among paradigm, problem formulation, theory, and methodology. The theoretical framework draws on the philosophy of science and the philosophy of social science, with emphasis on Kuhn’s concept of paradigm and Lakatos’s notion of the research programme. This study uses documentary research, conceptual analysis, theoretical reconstruction, and critical analysis to formulate the concept of &quot;methodological dominance&quot; and reconstruct the relationship among paradigm, theory, problem formulation, and methodology. Methodological dominance refers to a condition in which methodology moves beyond its subordinate role within research design and becomes a reference point for designing, conducting, and evaluating research. The study argues that the primacy of methodology, and consequently of methods and techniques, weakens sociology’s capacity for problem formulation, conceptualization, and theory building</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">This study is based on the premise that a problem in contemporary social science research is the inversion of its logical architecture and, consequently, a shift in the roles and relationships among paradigm, problem formulation, theory, and methodology. The theoretical framework draws on the philosophy of science and the philosophy of social science, with emphasis on Kuhn’s concept of paradigm and Lakatos’s notion of the research programme. This study uses documentary research, conceptual analysis, theoretical reconstruction, and critical analysis to formulate the concept of &quot;methodological dominance&quot; and reconstruct the relationship among paradigm, theory, problem formulation, and methodology. Methodological dominance refers to a condition in which methodology moves beyond its subordinate role within research design and becomes a reference point for designing, conducting, and evaluating research. The study argues that the primacy of methodology, and consequently of methods and techniques, weakens sociology’s capacity for problem formulation, conceptualization, and theory building</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Methodological dominance</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Logical architecture of the levels of analysis</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">paradigm</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">methodology</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Philosophy of Social Science</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
