<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Iranian Sociological of Association</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Iranian Journal of Sociology</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-1901</Issn>
				<Volume>15</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Research Ethics In Iranian social Science</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Research Ethics In Iranian social Science</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>3</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>23</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">21089</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Seyyed Ayatollah</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mirzaie</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Masoumeh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Qarakhani</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>05</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Ethical dishonesty in social research, though to a slight degree, can
undermine the foundations of social science and weaken its
investigative, critical and truth-finding role. To analyze the possible
ethical dishonesties and understand the normative space of research in
Iranian social science, the present study employs documentary method
for collecting and analyzing the published statements of researchers in
this field. The findings of the present research show that norm-violation
in research ethics in Iranian social science has individual and structural
dimensions. In the individual dimension, a lack of commitment to the
ethics research at personal and professional levels (in relation to the
form and content of research, research organization, and the violation of
scientific and professional norms and rules of conducting research) is of
importance. In the structural dimension, abuse of institutional and
organizational ethics and professional rules and commitments in relation
to the research and researcher (selecting subject, doing assignment,
refereeing, confirming, and reporting) is of significance. According to
the findings, ethical dishonesty in the space of research in Iranian social
science is the result of the interaction between of agents (researcher) and
institutional construct (including rules and norms and resources) which
facilitate norm violation. The result is that dishonesty in the research
ethics follows a duality of structure in the space of Iranian science and is
affected by the structural characteristics of the institution of science in
Iran in the period under study.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Ethical dishonesty in social research, though to a slight degree, can
undermine the foundations of social science and weaken its
investigative, critical and truth-finding role. To analyze the possible
ethical dishonesties and understand the normative space of research in
Iranian social science, the present study employs documentary method
for collecting and analyzing the published statements of researchers in
this field. The findings of the present research show that norm-violation
in research ethics in Iranian social science has individual and structural
dimensions. In the individual dimension, a lack of commitment to the
ethics research at personal and professional levels (in relation to the
form and content of research, research organization, and the violation of
scientific and professional norms and rules of conducting research) is of
importance. In the structural dimension, abuse of institutional and
organizational ethics and professional rules and commitments in relation
to the research and researcher (selecting subject, doing assignment,
refereeing, confirming, and reporting) is of significance. According to
the findings, ethical dishonesty in the space of research in Iranian social
science is the result of the interaction between of agents (researcher) and
institutional construct (including rules and norms and resources) which
facilitate norm violation. The result is that dishonesty in the research
ethics follows a duality of structure in the space of Iranian science and is
affected by the structural characteristics of the institution of science in
Iran in the period under study.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">scientific ethics, research ethics, dishonesty, scientific</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">community, institution of science, social science</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">http://www.jsi-isa.ir/article_21089_77557109d117fbb70757f8f00d6ed5e4.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Iranian Sociological of Association</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Iranian Journal of Sociology</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-1901</Issn>
				<Volume>15</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Compuer Offences Among Univerctty Students: An Empirical Test Of
Akers&#039; Social Learning Theory</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Compuer Offences Among Univerctty Students: An Empirical Test Of
Akers&#039; Social Learning Theory</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>24</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>56</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">21090</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Akbar</FirstName>
					<LastName>Aliverdinia</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Azam</FirstName>
					<LastName>Malekdar</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammadreza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Hasani</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>05</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>With the increase of computer-related deviant behaviors and formation of new  crime, individuals and society have come across many threats. The current study  tries to explain computer related offences among students of Mazandaran  University, with the use of Akers&#039; Social Learning Theory. Having done a  survey, we distributed a questionnaire between 403 students whom had been  selected by the use of proportional stratified sampling. The population was the  whole students of the University in 2012-2013. Computer Offences variable  consists of three dimensions: ‘against data &amp; system’, ‘identity theft’ and  ‘cultural’. Independent variables consists of differential association, differential  reinforcement, definitions and imitation and their effects on computer offences  are examined. Data is analyzed by “lisrel” and “Spss” software. The findings of  SEM demonstrate that the relationships between differential association and  differential reinforcement and computer-related offences are significant. The  differential association, however, has the strongest effect on it (Beta= 0/41).</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">With the increase of computer-related deviant behaviors and formation of new  crime, individuals and society have come across many threats. The current study  tries to explain computer related offences among students of Mazandaran  University, with the use of Akers&#039; Social Learning Theory. Having done a  survey, we distributed a questionnaire between 403 students whom had been  selected by the use of proportional stratified sampling. The population was the  whole students of the University in 2012-2013. Computer Offences variable  consists of three dimensions: ‘against data &amp; system’, ‘identity theft’ and  ‘cultural’. Independent variables consists of differential association, differential  reinforcement, definitions and imitation and their effects on computer offences  are examined. Data is analyzed by “lisrel” and “Spss” software. The findings of  SEM demonstrate that the relationships between differential association and  differential reinforcement and computer-related offences are significant. The  differential association, however, has the strongest effect on it (Beta= 0/41).</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Deviant Behavior</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">New crime</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Computer offences</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">students</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Social؛ learning</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">http://www.jsi-isa.ir/article_21090_30b6b8f7a8e3dba528fe76dec93d773a.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Iranian Sociological of Association</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Iranian Journal of Sociology</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-1901</Issn>
				<Volume>15</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Trust Agent-Based Modeling In Different Structures Of The Social Network</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Trust Agent-Based Modeling In Different Structures Of The Social Network</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>57</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>86</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">21091</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ahmadreza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Asgharpour Masole</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Atie</FirstName>
					<LastName>Sadeghi</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>05</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Social networks are a combination of social relationships and trust is assumed to  be one of the main features of social relationships. Distrust brings about lack of  cooperation and chaos in society. As a result, the present research aims at  creating and eroding trust in different network structures. As interactions are  taken place in social relationships, the way in which we select other trustees can  be influential in the formation of trust. The two important factors for agents to  select their interaction trustees are: the intensity of trust in social relationships  and the history of interaction. Thus, in the present research three strategies are  applied for selecting trustees in an interaction and they are all based on trust in a  relationship: selecting relationships with strong, medium and weak trust.  Trustees’ responses are grouped under two headings: random and trust- based  responses. To study precisely such a situation, agent- based modeling is used  because it helps understand processes and mechanisms and even artificial  experiments. In the two network structures, four types of status are designed for  the model. Each status is run 300 rounds and in 100 time units. The model output  was analyzed by the use of SPSS and Matlab soft wares. Findings indicate that  agents with strong strategies have the most capability in developing trust than  those with weak strategy. It is also impossible to accumulate trust in a  relationship within networks which agents respond randomly. Conversely, in the  networks that agents’ responds is based on trust, we witness trust accumulation  in long term period. In comparison to the cluster network, trust in central  networks is more likely to erode.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Social networks are a combination of social relationships and trust is assumed to  be one of the main features of social relationships. Distrust brings about lack of  cooperation and chaos in society. As a result, the present research aims at  creating and eroding trust in different network structures. As interactions are  taken place in social relationships, the way in which we select other trustees can  be influential in the formation of trust. The two important factors for agents to  select their interaction trustees are: the intensity of trust in social relationships  and the history of interaction. Thus, in the present research three strategies are  applied for selecting trustees in an interaction and they are all based on trust in a  relationship: selecting relationships with strong, medium and weak trust.  Trustees’ responses are grouped under two headings: random and trust- based  responses. To study precisely such a situation, agent- based modeling is used  because it helps understand processes and mechanisms and even artificial  experiments. In the two network structures, four types of status are designed for  the model. Each status is run 300 rounds and in 100 time units. The model output  was analyzed by the use of SPSS and Matlab soft wares. Findings indicate that  agents with strong strategies have the most capability in developing trust than  those with weak strategy. It is also impossible to accumulate trust in a  relationship within networks which agents respond randomly. Conversely, in the  networks that agents’ responds is based on trust, we witness trust accumulation  in long term period. In comparison to the cluster network, trust in central  networks is more likely to erode.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Trust</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Social Network</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">central network</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">cluster network</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">agent- based؛ modeling</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">http://www.jsi-isa.ir/article_21091_bcedd7d347bfbcfdb4b8c383c3f374c7.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Iranian Sociological of Association</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Iranian Journal of Sociology</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-1901</Issn>
				<Volume>15</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Examinning The Elements Of Religious Fund Amentalism In Iran With A
Local Approach</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Examinning The Elements Of Religious Fund Amentalism In Iran With A
Local Approach</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>87</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>125</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">20969</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ali Mohammad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Hazeri</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Marzie</FirstName>
					<LastName>Haji Hashemi</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>28</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>In this article, we would like to study the works of four prominent figures of  religious fundamentalism in contemporary Iran and to achieve a pattern that  represents the theoretical elements of this kind of political Islamism. To do this,  the thematic analysis is used. Here, the text data is described, organized and  interpreted and then the categories are driven from it. When the common  categories are found, they are supported thematically. This process continues  until a local and thematic pattern is designed. This pattern which is located in the  scope of Iranian political sociology represents the ideas of social and political  elites and actors of fundamentalism in Iran.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">In this article, we would like to study the works of four prominent figures of  religious fundamentalism in contemporary Iran and to achieve a pattern that  represents the theoretical elements of this kind of political Islamism. To do this,  the thematic analysis is used. Here, the text data is described, organized and  interpreted and then the categories are driven from it. When the common  categories are found, they are supported thematically. This process continues  until a local and thematic pattern is designed. This pattern which is located in the  scope of Iranian political sociology represents the ideas of social and political  elites and actors of fundamentalism in Iran.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">religious fundamentalism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">social and political ideas</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">government؛ form</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">law making</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Freedom</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">http://www.jsi-isa.ir/article_20969_1815de90dcf9f6b27dd6bff0f7a487bd.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Iranian Sociological of Association</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Iranian Journal of Sociology</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-1901</Issn>
				<Volume>15</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Cultural Studies of Gheirat (sexual jealousy) in Iran: A phenomenological
study on the male concern about female objectification and selfobjectification</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Cultural Studies of Gheirat (sexual jealousy) in Iran: A phenomenological
study on the male concern about female objectification and selfobjectification</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>126</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>152</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">21092</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohamod</FirstName>
					<LastName>SHahabi</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Vahid</FirstName>
					<LastName>Etaf</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>05</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Relying on a phenomenological, inductive and exploratory approach, the present
paper has been aimed at discovering men’s understanding of sexual jealousy and
the situations and moments in which men feel and act zealously or remain stolid
about their related females in their everyday life. We have used grounded theory
as a qualitative research method. Data were collected through interviews and
direct observation. The population under study includes Tehrani men aged
between 20-40 years old. We have employed theoretical sampling method. We
interviewed 25 men and 5 women as our sample. According to the research
results, Gheirat can best be defined as men’s anxiety about levels of women’s
objectification and self-objectification. By objectification, we mean reducing a
woman’s whole existence to her sexuality and treating her body as a sexual
object through some actions like gazing into a woman, teasing her, bodily
contacts, engaging in insincere emotional relationship with her, mingling or
socializing, and different levels of sexual relationships. Self-objectification also
refers to the voluntary or non-voluntary but active role of women in such
experiences. Iranian men experience differential degrees of anxiety towards their
related females’ levels of objectification and self-objectification. A combination
of the men&#039;s perception of the interaction space and the situation of the related
women and other men play a decisive role in provoking different emotions and
their corresponding actions. Therefore, some levels of Gheirat are to be
considered as cultural and situated rather than innate emotion.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Relying on a phenomenological, inductive and exploratory approach, the present
paper has been aimed at discovering men’s understanding of sexual jealousy and
the situations and moments in which men feel and act zealously or remain stolid
about their related females in their everyday life. We have used grounded theory
as a qualitative research method. Data were collected through interviews and
direct observation. The population under study includes Tehrani men aged
between 20-40 years old. We have employed theoretical sampling method. We
interviewed 25 men and 5 women as our sample. According to the research
results, Gheirat can best be defined as men’s anxiety about levels of women’s
objectification and self-objectification. By objectification, we mean reducing a
woman’s whole existence to her sexuality and treating her body as a sexual
object through some actions like gazing into a woman, teasing her, bodily
contacts, engaging in insincere emotional relationship with her, mingling or
socializing, and different levels of sexual relationships. Self-objectification also
refers to the voluntary or non-voluntary but active role of women in such
experiences. Iranian men experience differential degrees of anxiety towards their
related females’ levels of objectification and self-objectification. A combination
of the men&#039;s perception of the interaction space and the situation of the related
women and other men play a decisive role in provoking different emotions and
their corresponding actions. Therefore, some levels of Gheirat are to be
considered as cultural and situated rather than innate emotion.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Sexual Jealousy, Objectification, Self-objectification, Anxiety,</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Situatedness</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">http://www.jsi-isa.ir/article_21092_c139ffc26fbaf2d15418c8c53abcfed8.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Iranian Sociological of Association</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Iranian Journal of Sociology</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-1901</Issn>
				<Volume>15</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Meta-Analysis Of Studies On Violence Against Women</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Meta-Analysis Of Studies On Violence Against Women</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>153</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>177</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">21093</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Aliye</FirstName>
					<LastName>SHekarbeygi</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0001-8485-7201</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Reza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mostame</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>05</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Violence against women at home and in society in all countries has always been
perceived as a concern. Much research has been done, but because of their
different methods and theories, no one has found a new path for the future
studies. In this meta-analysis, after classifying the theories of 22 applied studies
in this field, we distinguished the most used of them and their methods as well.
With classifying the hypotheses, we realized that the theoretical relevance and
theoretical model were hardly consistent and the sources, learning and feminist
theories were the most useful ones in the hypothetical model. At the end with the
use of statistical methods, the role of the three theories in explaining the
hypotheses were examined our proposals were grouped based on the economic,
educational and gender status.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Violence against women at home and in society in all countries has always been
perceived as a concern. Much research has been done, but because of their
different methods and theories, no one has found a new path for the future
studies. In this meta-analysis, after classifying the theories of 22 applied studies
in this field, we distinguished the most used of them and their methods as well.
With classifying the hypotheses, we realized that the theoretical relevance and
theoretical model were hardly consistent and the sources, learning and feminist
theories were the most useful ones in the hypothetical model. At the end with the
use of statistical methods, the role of the three theories in explaining the
hypotheses were examined our proposals were grouped based on the economic,
educational and gender status.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">violence, women, Violence against women, meta-analysis, family</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Violence</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">http://www.jsi-isa.ir/article_21093_dacbf079ffedc402d67968f7757064dd.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Iranian Sociological of Association</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Iranian Journal of Sociology</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-1901</Issn>
				<Volume>15</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Jamh‌Shnasy analytical and social mechanisms</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Jamh‌Shnasy analytical and social mechanisms</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>178</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>182</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">21891</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ebrahimi</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract></Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA"></OtherAbstract>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">http://www.jsi-isa.ir/article_21891_598e989a5706e1ab5cea5e65598d2125.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
